Welcome Guest! Create an Account login email: password: remember me: BASKETBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting FOOTBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting MESSAGE BOARD Message Home - Ohio Basketball - Ohio Basketball Recruiting - The O Zone - Ohio Football - Ohio Football Recruiting - Ohio Volleyball - Ohio Baseball - Ohio Olympic Sports... - General OU Discussion... - Website Feedback... - Posting Policy Edit My Profile Private Messages Logout CHAT LINKS site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp Message Board BobcatAttack.com Message Board Ohio Basketball Topic:  The State of the Program Topic:  The State of the Program Author Message 71 BOBCAT General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Post Count: 1,872 Status: Offline     The State of the Program    Posted: 3/27/2021 9:15:28 AM  If all this years players return there is no telling what this team can accomplish. And let's not forget that this team could be together for 2 more years based on NCAA rules. We will most likely be preseason conference winners. We will also be considered an NCAA Tournament team. We could also be a top 10 team, like Jim Snyder's 1969-70 team was in December of 1969. Next point to consider will be how well we can recruit with our recent success. THE FUTURE IS BRIGHT GO BOBCATS Back to Top Obc2 General User Member Since: 11/8/2007 Location: Cincinnati, OH Post Count: 596 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/27/2021 10:12:08 AM  This is not meant to temper tour enthusiam buti felt the exact same way in 2013. I researched ncaa rd 1 venues before the season and made travel plans in my head. Ahhhh, good times! Back to Top Pataskala General User Member Since: 7/8/2010 Location: At least six feet away from anybody else Post Count: 9,296 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/27/2021 10:17:02 AM  It would really help to schedule four or five mid-to-high level "P" teams for next season. It would really help our seeding for NCAA tourney purposes and help our chances for an at-large bid in case the MAC tourney doesn't work out. Winning a few of them would also be a boost. We will get by. We will get by. We will get by. We will survive. Back to Top Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame General User Member Since: 7/30/2010 Post Count: 3,458 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/27/2021 10:22:05 AM  We got our asses kicked by Creighton. Sure, we shot poorly. But aside from a 6 minute stretch in the second half, Creighton got exactly what they wanted offensively. Their ball movement had us two steps behind every action, they got tons of wide open looks and shots at the rim. They probably shot 90% at the rim, too. We had a great season. We have good talent and a lot of promise. We're not a top 10 team. We're not Gonzaga of the midwest. We're still a mid-major in a one bid league -- who finished third in that league, mind you. We can be very good next year, and not go to the tournament. It's a small minority, but the expectations are getting pretty crazy amongst that small minority. Last Edited: 3/27/2021 10:33:46 AM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame Back to Top bornacatfan General User Member Since: 8/3/2006 Post Count: 5,711 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/27/2021 10:27:59 AM  Pataskala wrote: It would really help to schedule four or five mid-to-high level "P" teams for next season. It would really help our seeding for NCAA tourney purposes and help our chances for an at-large bid in case the MAC tourney doesn't work out. Winning a few of them would also be a boost. I think the scheduling philosophy advanced to me over the years bears this out. "we need to schedule for all the new blood" translated to Norfolk St, NC A&T, Lamar and some of those teams that were going to be strong in a weaker league (Fuss was a master of finding those) to now....where we should be looking at filling those spots with P5 teams that are beatable to help. This is one of those years where what I was told "once we have a senior laden team with experience we can schedule those..." applies. Walk it like you talk it and get it done. never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer..... The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game Back to Top Jeff McKinney Moderator Member Since: 11/12/2004 Post Count: 6,101 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/27/2021 12:27:58 PM  Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote: We got our asses kicked by Creighton. Sure, we shot poorly. But aside from a 6 minute stretch in the second half, Creighton got exactly what they wanted offensively. Their ball movement had us two steps behind every action, they got tons of wide open looks and shots at the rim. They probably shot 90% at the rim, too. We had a great season. We have good talent and a lot of promise. We're not a top 10 team. We're not Gonzaga of the midwest. We're still a mid-major in a one bid league -- who finished third in that league, mind you. We can be very good next year, and not go to the tournament. It's a small minority, but the expectations are getting pretty crazy amongst that small minority. Agree. Back to Top TWT General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Alexandria, VA Post Count: 4,998 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/27/2021 12:47:52 PM  Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote: We're still a mid-major in a one bid league -- who finished third in that league, mind you. We can be very good next year, and not go to the tournament. It's a small minority, but the expectations are getting pretty crazy amongst that small minority. A one bid league with Ohio, Buffalo and Akron the only serious contenders. The probability of winning Cleveland is going to be up with all the returning players. Likely to at least make it to the MAC semifinals. I don't see a reason not to be excited about higher expectations that come with more and better TV slots for next season. Didn't Toledo get an appearance on CBS as the top regular season team? Any big non-conference opponent is going to be interesting because of the real hope the bobcats can win. Be excited but don't be disappointed if we don't make it back to the NCAAs. Most Memorable Bobcat Events Attended 2010 97-83 win over Georgetown in NCAA 1st round 2012 45-13 victory over ULM in the Independence Bowl 2015 34-3 drubbing of Miami @ Peden front of 25,086 Back to Top bobcat 2000 General User Member Since: 1/21/2006 Post Count: 191 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/27/2021 6:15:10 PM  We should schedule specifically to get experience we normally wouldn't. That means plying in pre season tourneys with strong teams to get us battle tested. Add in some non conference games against teams lik duke,Kentucky,and Michigan state. Jeff could then sit with the coach and ask for help in how to utilize players and what to do differently. Back to Top bobcat 2000 General User Member Since: 1/21/2006 Post Count: 191 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/28/2021 12:24:24 AM  I agree,we aren't a top 10 team . We're not even a top 25 team. We do have potential but it's not fully utilized in the mac. Conference USA, American and big east are all multi bid conferences we could compete with the teams in these conferences well enough not to have to win the tourney to see the NCAA tournament. Back to Top bornacatfan General User Member Since: 8/3/2006 Post Count: 5,711 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/28/2021 12:26:50 AM  bobcat 2000 wrote: I agree,we aren't a top 10 team . We're not even a top 25 team. We do have potential but it's not fully utilized in the mac. Conference USA, American and big east are all multi bid conferences we could compete with the teams in these conferences well enough not to have to win the tourney to see the NCAA tournament. true ....but I think giacomo will be here in a minute to remind you we can't afford to get to those places to play games. never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer..... The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game Back to Top Jeff McKinney Moderator Member Since: 11/12/2004 Post Count: 6,101 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/28/2021 1:04:21 AM  CUSA is NOT a multi bid league. That's been explained on here several times, but 2000 refuses to grasp it. Back to Top OUVan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Bethesda, MD Post Count: 5,580 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/28/2021 8:30:07 AM  bobcat 2000 wrote: I agree,we aren't a top 10 team . We're not even a top 25 team. We do have potential but it's not fully utilized in the mac. Conference USA, American and big east are all multi bid conferences we could compete with the teams in these conferences well enough not to have to win the tourney to see the NCAA tournament. 16 Teams make the playoffs in the NBA. Let's do that! Back to Top Victory General User Member Since: 3/10/2012 Post Count: 2,154 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/28/2021 12:15:27 PM  bobcat 2000 wrote: I agree,we aren't a top 10 team . We're not even a top 25 team. We do have potential but it's not fully utilized in the mac. Conference USA, American and big east are all multi bid conferences we could compete with the teams in these conferences well enough not to have to win the tourney to see the NCAA tournament. Your obsession with arguing to get the program to increase its costs and abandon longstanding rivalries and partnerships for a minor stepdown in recent average level of play in CUSA is just bizarre. Back to Top JSF General User Member Since: 1/29/2005 Location: Houston, TX Post Count: 6,420 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/28/2021 2:04:28 PM  Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote: We got our asses kicked by Creighton. Sure, we shot poorly. But aside from a 6 minute stretch in the second half, Creighton got exactly what they wanted offensively. Their ball movement had us two steps behind every action, they got tons of wide open looks and shots at the rim. They probably shot 90% at the rim, too. No. This is an exaggeration. They made a lot contested shots in addition to open ones, and our defense didn't start to give until the second half when energy faded. Creighton didn't shoot a free throw for the first, what, 30 minutes? They made jump shots, but I will stand by us being the better team in the paint. We won the second half. It wasn't a tense game, but we made them perform to beat us. "Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season. My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8 Back to Top Casper71 General User Member Since: 12/1/2006 Post Count: 2,919 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/28/2021 2:15:08 PM  JSF...we were the better team in the paint? What game were you watching? We couldn't guard them in the paint and we don't play above the rim like they did. Sorry, I really disagree with you on this one. Back to Top JSF General User Member Since: 1/29/2005 Location: Houston, TX Post Count: 6,420 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/28/2021 3:34:27 PM  We had more second chance points, we dominated on the boards, and we held them to 37% in the second half in 2-pointers to our 41%. As I said, I stand by it. Offensively, we did not have much trouble inside from their defense. We just missed shots we should not have. The game was lost on the perimeter and the turnover battle. "Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season. My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8 Back to Top TWT General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Alexandria, VA Post Count: 4,998 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/28/2021 3:39:15 PM  bobcat 2000 wrote: I agree,we aren't a top 10 team . We're not even a top 25 team. We do have potential but it's not fully utilized in the mac. Conference USA, American and big east are all multi bid conferences we could compete with the teams in these conferences well enough not to have to win the tourney to see the NCAA tournament. Coattail bids have become rare. Its about who you can beat and you'll need at least 3 wins against teams in your conference that are locks for the tourney on their own resume to have a chance. Bids to the NCAAT aren't given out like candy. Most Memorable Bobcat Events Attended 2010 97-83 win over Georgetown in NCAA 1st round 2012 45-13 victory over ULM in the Independence Bowl 2015 34-3 drubbing of Miami @ Peden front of 25,086 Back to Top Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame General User Member Since: 7/30/2010 Post Count: 3,458 Status: Offline     RE: The State of the Program    Posted: 3/28/2021 7:35:31 PM  JSF wrote: Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote: We got our asses kicked by Creighton. Sure, we shot poorly. But aside from a 6 minute stretch in the second half, Creighton got exactly what they wanted offensively. Their ball movement had us two steps behind every action, they got tons of wide open looks and shots at the rim. They probably shot 90% at the rim, too. No. This is an exaggeration. They made a lot contested shots in addition to open ones, and our defense didn't start to give until the second half when energy faded. Creighton didn't shoot a free throw for the first, what, 30 minutes? They made jump shots, but I will stand by us being the better team in the paint. We won the second half. It wasn't a tense game, but we made them perform to beat us. I'd like it to be an exaggeration, and I'm proud of the way the team fought. But I'm not sure it's a huge exaggeration, unfortunately. Despite not shooting a free throw for 30 minutes, they still averaged more FTA per FGA than we did. Their TS% was 52.5%. Ours was 37.1%. Going off the ESPN shot chart, we went 10-27 in the paint. They went 14 for 23. Their win probability never dipped below 90% in the second half. Shooting percentage isn't everything, obviously. But Bishop alone had 4 or 5 easy buckets in the paint for them and as hard as Wilson worked, he had trouble with their length. Back to Top Showing Replies:   1 - 18  of 18 Posts Jump to Page:   1 View Other 'Ohio Basketball' Topics                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               WHO'S ONLINE There are 488 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com 487 Guests 1 Registered User:   OUs LONG Driver There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties