Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football Recruiting
Topic:  2011 Recruiting Class review

Topic:  2011 Recruiting Class review
Author
Message
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,274

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 4/29/2011 5:03:45 PM 
For a number of years I have computed a composite rating for players that takes into account ratings from Scout, Rivals, and ESPN, and also the competitive offers received by recruits. My concept is while one individual rater may be right sometimes and wrong other times, the more different people that look at a player and think he is good, the more likely it is that he really is good. The actual method of combining, or the specific number isn't that significant, just the fact that I do it the same way every year. The average per player for Freshmen has risen steadily since 2006, going 174, 179, 226, 253, and. 227, but there is a huge jump to 296 this year. It gets even more interesting when you look at the actual players. Here are the incoming Freshmen since 2006 ranked 234 or better:
2006 Horace Hubbard 348
2006 Terrance McCrae 344
2006 Ernie Hodge 276
2006 Taylor Price 234
2007 Noah Keller 289
2007 Donte Harden 269
2007 Joe Flading 243
2008 Bakari Bussey 444
2008 Matt Britain 403
2008 Gerald Moore 371
2008 Tremayne Scott 322
2009 John Lechner 482
2009 Xavier Hughes 368
2009 John Taylor 248
2009 Gary Fortune 243
2010 Nathan Carpenter 347
2010 Mark Smith 288
2010 Josh Kristoff 258
2010 Chase Cochran 256
2010 Jamal Torrant 243
2010 Anthony Grady 241
Note that this list includes about 4 each year, a total of 21 from the 5 years. Note that it also includes many players that turned out to be very good, and a few that weren't able to play due to injury, or who ended up leaving school. Now look at the 2011 class:
2011 Ben Russell 465
2011 Landon Smith 442
2011 Antwan Crutcher 439
2011 Eric Price 389
2011 Tony Davis 375
2011 Jacob Welter 357
2011 Lorenzo Fisher 344
2011 Aaron Macer 326
2011 Tyler Knight 308
2011 Mike McQueen 304
2011 Justin Haser 303
2011 Brad Spivey 290
2011 Kyle Hammonds 280
2011 Ian Wells 276
2011 Andrew Bennett 272
2011 Derrius Vick 246
2011 Brandon Purdum 243
2011 Lucas Powel 240
2011 Ronnie Bell 232

Hmmm......19 in the 2011 class, 21 combined in the 2006-2010 classes. If these numbers have any validity, Ohio should be fun to watch the next few years.

Last Edited: 4/29/2011 5:05:27 PM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
ytownbobcat
General User

Member Since: 8/7/2006
Post Count: 1,253

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 4/30/2011 9:13:19 AM 
Thanks for doing this project L.C.. I have thought that our incoming talent is on the rise during the Solich years. In the old days we recruited some "projects" that actually never turned into the players that we projected. It resulted into a situation where we had scholoship athletes that actually couldn't hold their own on the field of play.
If you look at today's active roster ,the players have speed and a physical approach to the game , and gradually we have been adding BCS type size by position. Your statistical method verifies what we all have been thinking.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,274

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 4/30/2011 12:16:13 PM 
Your comments echo my observations. Clearly  there were talented players recruited prior to Solich, but in the early  years the Solich classes were generally better because of improvement on the bottom end: there were fewer "projects" that just didn't work out. Now we are seeing improvement at the upper end, too.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
The Situation
General User



Member Since: 7/12/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 4/30/2011 1:05:54 PM 
Great post L.C. Thanks for putting in the time to give us a little analysis from one of our own. Considering the 2006 class could see it's second player drafted today, and the fourth Bobcat drafted in each of the last four years, this 2011 class should grab that first bowl victory and top 25 ranking, on top of regaining control of that elusive MAC Championship.
Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 4/30/2011 1:26:31 PM 
Thanks, great work, L.C.  Some might argue that Landon Smith's spring ball lends credence.


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
Bobcatzblitz
General User

Member Since: 7/21/2010
Post Count: 1,727

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 5/1/2011 3:27:49 PM 
...The Leftwich twins where 3 stars..dont see them on the list
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,274

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 5/2/2011 1:45:11 AM 
L.C. wrote:
.... Here are the incoming Freshmen since 2006 ranked 234 or better....

Indeed there have been many good players that came in from Juco, including the Leftwich twins, and many highly ranked players that transferred from other four year schools. The list above, however, includes only players who came to Ohio as Freshmen. One of my points is that, as Ohio recruits better Freshmen, they have less need to rely on Jucos and transfers for core needs.

Last Edited: 5/2/2011 2:15:22 PM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Bobcatzblitz
General User

Member Since: 7/21/2010
Post Count: 1,727

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 5/3/2011 11:24:47 AM 
Tyler Knight--Georgia Military College...Thats why I assumed you where including JUCOs.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,274

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 5/3/2011 7:26:32 PM 
Oops, good catch. He should not have been in that list, nor should Spivey. I do have scores for Jucos and transfers, but I often have to fill in numbers. For example, ESPN never rates the jucos. Also, the market for jucos is thinner, so you don't see many of them choosing Ohio over other offers, or, if they have them, we don't hear about them. For transfers the problems are different, such as the fact that, if they are leaving another school, it may be because they weren't getting the playing time they hoped for, which may mean that their initial rating was too high. Finally, I don't always have ratings on all the xfers, so the data is incomplete. With those flaws in mind, here are some numbers for some of the jucos and xfers:
2006 - Hinton 586
2006 - Bower 476
2007 - Braunstein 469
2007 - Carter 423
2007 - Flintall 361
2008 - Dawson 372
2008 - Jackson 342
2008 - Tafua 251
2009 - Gross 234
2010 - Prior 687
2010 - Omar Leftwich 323
2010 - Kozak 299
2010 - Octavious Leftwich 220
2011 - Knight 308
2011 - Spivey 290

The transfers and jucos don't really trend like the freshmen. It is more hit or miss. They take what they get, and fill in where they need, and some years what they get is better than others.

Last Edited: 5/3/2011 7:27:24 PM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Doc Bobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,219

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 5/3/2011 7:31:08 PM 
L.C. wrote:
Oops, good catch. He should not have been in that list, nor should Spivey. I do have scores for Jucos and transfers, but I often have to fill in numbers. For example, ESPN never rates the jucos. Also, the market for jucos is thinner, so you don't see many of them choosing Ohio over other offers, or, if they have them, we don't hear about them. For transfers the problems are different, such as the fact that, if they are leaving another school, it may be because they weren't getting the playing time they hoped for, which may mean that their initial rating was too high. Finally, I don't always have ratings on all the xfers, so the data is incomplete. With those flaws in mind, here are some numbers for some of the jucos and xfers:
2006 - Hinton 586
2006 - Bower 476
2007 - Braunstein 469
2007 - Carter 423
2007 - Flintall 361
2008 - Dawson 372
2008 - Jackson 342
2008 - Tafua 251
2009 - Gross 234
2010 - Prior 687
2010 - Omar Leftwich 323
2010 - Kozak 299
2010 - Octavious Leftwich 220
2011 - Knight 308
2011 - Spivey 290

The transfers and jucos don't really trend like the freshmen. It is more hit or miss. They take what they get, and fill in where they need, and some years what they get is better than others.


Prior 687.......wow!!!
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,274

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 5/4/2011 4:46:39 PM 
Lol, doc, its just a number. All it means is that he had a lot of offers, and good ratings from the services. I think that's a pretty typical number for recruits at Top 10 schools. In the end he still needs to produce on the field.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Doc Bobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,219

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: 2011 Recruiting Class review
   Posted: 5/4/2011 5:31:11 PM 
L.C. wrote:
Lol, doc, its just a number. All it means is that he had a lot of offers, and good ratings from the services. I think that's a pretty typical number for recruits at Top 10 schools. In the end he still needs to produce on the field.


That's what I told everyone about my SAT scores....haha.
Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 12  of 12 Posts
Jump to Page:  1
View Other 'Ohio Football Recruiting' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties